Documentation

Four documents, written from the code rather than around it. Each one says what Appealy actually does, and where the reasoning behind it lives.

How these are written

Every page here cites the file it is describing. That is not decoration: it is the only way a document like this stays true. A claim with a filename beside it can be checked in ten seconds by anyone reading the repository, and it fails loudly when the code moves. A claim without one quietly rots.

Where something is unfinished, these pages say so rather than describing the intended version. Denial outcomes do not exist yet; the history purge ships disabled; there is no ban-creation UI. Those are all stated on the page that would otherwise imply otherwise.

Nothing here is a promise about a future release. If a feature is described in the present tense on this site, it is in main today. The roadmap lives in the repository's issues, where it can be argued with.

What is deliberately not here

The repository carries a second class of document — engineering notes written for whoever is changing the code, not for whoever is running it. Those stay in the repository, because putting them on a public site would present internal working notes as product documentation:

In the repositoryIs
SCALING.md A scaling audit against the real code — what breaks first, and why it is the Postgres pool rather than the dashboard
STARTUP.md Why command registration is a deploy step and not a boot step, and the Discord rate limit that decides it
DOCKER.md Container and Cloud Run specifics: the port, the proxy, the domain mapping
SETUP.md The operator checklist for the hosted deployment — migrations, caps, sharding, billing
PI.md Running the stack on a Raspberry Pi, including the parts that are about power supplies rather than software

Something on these pages wrong, or missing? Open an issue — a documentation bug is a bug.